Reading: I managed to read "Mansfield Park," which kept me interested for a while until I figured the ending would be just as banal as I feared. Austen managed to write better female characters when she threw in a vice or two [see Emma or Elisabeth] but this Fanny gal was unbelievably dull - she'd make a great parody of herself if anything amusing happened to her at all - and she only deserved the sickening husband she got. For the other thing see below
Music: The most interesting discovery was Bob Geldof, who appears to have a lot of what I like, musically. It was a surprise because before I didn't really know who he was except for a vague idea that he had something to do with U2 [shame shame]. Also, Paganini goes great with nature and birches, which I know because my music player played one Capriccio when I was hammocking underneath birch trees [oh yeah, the impressive intellectual I am I have Paganini on my music player; but only one bit]
Mood: Sunny and rested, thankyouverymuch
|
Yay, the retreat was fun, plenty of badminton and other relaxing goodness. It helped that I love the part of the country where we were staying, with its wild nature and plenty of lakes. I used to spend holidays there every year and it was nice to return. To sum up, we had a great time. And onto the other pressing matter.
Since I defended and praised "Gone with the Wind" often enough I feel it only right to share with you my new sensation of shock at its undeniable racism that the current reading brought me. Maybe I overlooked it in my early readings because I was stupid or maybe it was Rhett's charm but most likely that was because I only read translations. To make matters more complicated, I still find it an exquisite book, if very much behind its time where instead of modernist experimentation it offers a grand 19th-century-styled classic novel that Europe had plenty of and the States not so many. While it would benefit from some editing, it still manages to be an epos describing the passing of society as much as it is a romance, cheapened by the popular movie. And the characters are drawn beautifully in all their richness, which I always find the most important aspect of storytelling. But, only white characters. How could an artist of Mitchell's imagination not have even a fraction of it for the black characters? Had she only tried to show the things from a less appallingly-biased perspective she could have written an unsurpassed account of the death of a nation. As it is, she wrote a novel which while gripping makes you writhe uncomfortably and wonder who else you've told that it's your favorite book.
|